Why Physical Filters Are Still Important
I got a question from Linda about physical filters and why I use them. Given how much can be done in post processing, are physical filters still needed?
For most of the scenes I photograph, I believe physical filters are superior to post processing. I explain why in today’s video. Also, there is one type of filter I’ll never own and prefer to use digital tools. Watch the video and find out which filter I think it completely unnecessary now.
You Might Also Enjoy
Test your own filters for a color cast. All you need is a reference point and consistent lighting.
I get asked about my tripod spikes all the time. Finally another company is making a set like the ones I have.
Calibrating your monitor and printer can be a bit of a hassle. And you need equipment for it. Is it really necessary?
Not all printer drivers are created equal. You could be missing out on important controls and settings for your photo prints.
I use the X-Rite i1 Studio to color calibrate my monitor and printer. The dial on the device may be a little difficult to rotate. I’ll show you the simple trick I use to make it easy.
A seascape outing usually results in a lot of photos of a few compositions. Culling is critical to keep the working set of photos manageable.
Image theft happens… and it sucks. I use Pixsy to help me find potential infringements on my work. I’ll show you the basics of what I look for when I review matches found by the service.
Scott Davenport is a landscape photographer and photo educator and based in San Diego, California. He leads photo workshops, writes photo books, hosts podcasts, makes tutorial videos, and feels weird referring to himself in the 3rd person.
He also can't help getting his feet wet photographing at the beach.
Finding several unique images within your existing photo is a great way to grow your eye for composition. You might have new, compelling photos hiding in plain sight.